不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比
Alternative TitleCOMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DREDGED SEDIMENT TREATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS
马涛1,2; 宋江敏1,2; 刘群群1,2; 盛彦清1
Source Publication环境工程
ISSN1000-8942
2021
Volume39Issue:2Pages:141-
Keyword疏浚 沉积物 重金属 生态风险 土工管袋填埋 减量化处置
MOST Discipline CatalogueEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
AbstractTaking the sediment disposal demonstration project of Yihe River in Shandong province as an example,the ecological risks of sediment after three years of geo-textile tube landfill and reduction disposal were tracked to explore the effects of different disposal methods on the safety of heavy metals in sediments.The total concentrations and geochemical fractions of Cr,As,Zn,Cu,Cd,Pb,and Hg in sediments by the two disposal methods were analyzed.Meanwhile,their ecological risks and environmental safety were assessed by leaching toxicity method,risk assessment code (RAC),and potential ecological risk index method (PERI).The obtained results showed total concentrations of As,Cd,and Hg in sediments from two different disposal sites exceeded the risk screening value of the Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agricultural Land (GB 15618-2018).The geochemical fraction distribution of Zn and Hg in the sediments of the two sites was quite different,and the difference was mainly related to the differences of two disposal methods.The leaching toxicity test showed that the leaching toxicity of Cr,As,and Cu in geo-textile tube landfill was higher than that in reduction disposal,while the leaching toxity of Zn was on the contrary.According to the results of leaching toxicity,RAC,and PERI,the ecological risk of geo-textile tube landfill was relatively higher.In order to maximize the environmental and economic benefits,it was necessary to weigh all aspects of factors when choosing which way to treat the dredged sediments.
Other Abstract以山东沂河沉积物处置示范工程为例,分别对经土工管袋填埋和减量化隔离处置3年后的沉积物生态风险进行跟踪评价,以探究不同处置方式对沉积物重金属安全性的影响。对2种处置方式下沉积物中Cr、As、Zn、Cu、Cd、Pb和Hg的总量及赋存形态进行分析,并采用浸出毒性法、风险评价编码法(RAC)和潜在生态风险指数法(PERI)进行生态风险和环境安全性评估。结果表明:2种沉积物处置场地内沉积物As、Cd和Hg总量超过GB 15618-2018《土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)》的风险筛选值;2种场地内沉积物中Zn和Hg的形态分布存在较大差异;浸出毒性实验表明,土工管袋填埋处置Cr、As和Cu浸出毒性高于减量化隔离处置,而Zn则相反。综合浸出毒性法、RAC和PERI的结果,经土工管袋填埋处置后沉积物重金属的生态风险相对较高。在选择何种方式对疏浚沉积物进行异位处理时,应综合权衡各个方面因素,以确保环境效益和经济效益的最大化。
SubtypeArticle
Funding Organization国家自然科学基金 ; 山东省重点研发计划
Indexed ByCSCD
Language中文
CSCD IDCSCD:6950902
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.yic.ac.cn/handle/133337/30291
Collection中科院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室_海岸带环境工程技术研究与发展中心
Affiliation1.中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所,山东烟台264003;
2.中国科学院大学,北京100049
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
马涛,宋江敏,刘群群,等. 不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比[J]. 环境工程,2021,39(2):141-.
APA 马涛,宋江敏,刘群群,&盛彦清.(2021).不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比.环境工程,39(2),141-.
MLA 马涛,et al."不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比".环境工程 39.2(2021):141-.
Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评(452KB)期刊论文出版稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SAView Download
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[马涛]'s Articles
[宋江敏]'s Articles
[刘群群]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[马涛]'s Articles
[宋江敏]'s Articles
[刘群群]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[马涛]'s Articles
[宋江敏]'s Articles
[刘群群]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.